Search for: "Motion"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 152,923
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
Benton then filed a motion for judgment of acquittal and a motion for a new trial, which were both rejected by the DC Circuit Court in January 2023. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:31 am
Newrez, LLC (Omitted party action per 49-30; motion to open judgment; correction of redemption amount; 47-258(b)) [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:28 am
On May 18, 2023, it entered a decision on opposing motions for summary judgment in a size protest that had become a False Claims Act case. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
Court Rules in Favor of SEC on Coinbase’s Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:18 am
Healey (Summary process; whether trial court improperly denied defendants' motion to open and dismiss judgment of possession; whether defendants were classically or statutorily aggrieved by plaintiff's failure to serve notice to quit on nonparty minor child) [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:10 am
.): 16 Motion for Injunction 27 SunZia Response 30 Federal Response 43 Reply 56 DCt Order Prior post here. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:51 am
.): 1 Complaint 59 US Motion to Dismiss 66 Individual Defendants Motion to Dismiss 71 State Defendants Motion to Dismiss 76 Response 78 Individual Defendants Reply 79 State Reply 80 US Reply 89 Magistrate Report 90 Objection 91 Individual Defendants Response 92 US Response 93 State Reply 95 DCT Order [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:50 am
With a motion to dismiss, the defendant hopes to end the case here and now. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:35 am
The Ohio Supreme Court (Chief Judge Kennedy) has denied a motion to disqualify a municipal court judge Albert Thrower, who avers that he is doing business as St. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
In the long-running multidistrict action alleging that Visa, Mastercard, and numerous banks violated federal and state antitrust laws by conspiring to inflate certain transaction fees, the federal district court in Brooklyn, New York: 1) denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the 7-Eleven and Home Depot plaintiffs’ debit monopolization claim and attempted monopolization claim; 2) granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:45 am
Conclusion: The motion to exclude the expert witness opinion of Dr. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
After discovery, the Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment arguing that the Plaintiff could not demonstrate that he acted negligently in operating his vehicle and that there was no proximate causation established by the Plaintiff with respect to the Defendant’s actions and the Plaintiff’s alleged injuries. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:12 am
An evidentiary hearing was directed on the motion, during which plaintiff agreed by stipulation to withdraw her motion to vacate the charging lien with prejudice and to authorize the fee at issue to be withdrawn from counsel’s Divorce IOLA account. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
The 11th Circuit Court Of Appeals was scheduled to hear that five-year habeas corpus motion from Stewart Parnell but pulled it back. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 pm
” A three-judge panel at the 9th Circuit ruled unanimously against Payne, affirming a US District Court’s denial of Payne’s motion to suppress evidence. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
(Whenever I read a motion for a preliminary injunction, I usually gloss over the "irreparable harm" section because it is so formulaic.) [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:23 pm
(Termination of parental rights; reasonable efforts to reunify; best interest of the child; denial of motion for continuance) [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:21 pm
(Termination of parental rights; mootness; reasonable efforts to reunify; best interest of the child standard; motion for continuance) [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm
" A three-judge panel at the 9th Circuit ruled unanimously against Payne, affirming a US District Court's denial of Payne's motion to suppress evidence. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
Defendants’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM [Doc. 214] is GRANTED IN PART, this Court having concluded that the States of Louisiana and Florida do not have Article III standing to challenge the Asylum IFR, and all other Plaintiff States having abandoned their claims of standing with respect to the Asylum IFR. [read post]
