Search for: "New York Times Co. v. United States"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 2,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Indeed, as the plaintiffs themselves noted, the novel upon which 13 Reasons Why was based "was a hit, making the New York Times' young-adult best-seller list a few times. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for example, has focused on ESG by investigating and taking action against companies that tout business practices such as consideration of environmental sustainability, but fail, in practice, to live up to their claims. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
But the risk of default is surely less when times are good, when credit is cheaper, and transaction costs stable. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
” Most recently, The New York Times reported that companies have engaged in the practice of collecting vast amounts of innocuous data on an individual in order to collect sensitive information about customers. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
The controversy was a prime case to examine whether Islamic law and liberal democracy can co-exist within a liberal constitutional framework. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
This even though the shortage made the New York Times and other major papers and was a topic of intense public interest.CAH: You argue that sometimes the FDA does not have that authority, but sometimes it does... [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 10:48 am
EEOC, was filed by Democracy Forward in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
On the federal front, the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
It states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be…subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial ass [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Finally, here is a seminal law review article by Randy Barnett – whom the New York Times called the “intellectual godfather” of these lawsuits – that shows why the federal requirement that everybody enter the marketplace and buy a particular product is unprecedented and unconstitutional. 2. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
In the United States, Facebook once demonstrated its ability to make users happier or sadder by manipulating their news feed. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
In a (not entirely successful) attempt to keep the litigation of this contentious case under control, Judge Peck, from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, bifurcated the trial—limiting the first phase to the questions of whether Iridium was insolvent or had unreasonably small capital. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm
A major split has developed between courts in New York and in California: the former generally allow Section 11 suits to be removed to Federal court, while the latter generally do not. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm
All of the proxies started dancing (you can find most of them on the venerable Google Shill List from the Oracle v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:41 am
As a New York Times editorial stated, the MCA "give[s] Mr. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
(Although Clayton County is a government entity, Bostock for some reason did not bring a constitutional claim under the Fourteenth Amendment--his allegations were limited to Title VII.)Donald Zarda, an openly gay man, worked as a skydiving instructor for Altitude Express, Inc., a New York company doing business on Long Island. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:02 pm
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
At the same time, we’ve been accused of picking winners and losers, stifling innovation, and driving crypto businesses to more favorable, foreign jurisdictions, wherever they may be. [read post]
