Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
Teladoc, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
For example, the social/affordable average rent figures used are from 2013/14, not 14/15, let alone 15/16. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
Failure to follow this axiom left the tenant in Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
Plaintiff’s testimony coherently describes his weekly work schedule, including typical daily start and end times which he used to estimate a standard work week of sixty-five to sixty-eight hours. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
Plaintiff’s testimony coherently describes his weekly work schedule, including typical daily start and end times which he used to estimate a standard work week of sixty-five to sixty-eight hours. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:39 pm
The Committee understood the complainant’s concern about the use of the claim “Highland laird wannabes [have been] fooled into thinking they have bought Scottish land in multi-million-pound global scheme. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Here, the employee’s testimony coherently described his weekly work schedule, including typical daily start and end times which he used to estimate a standard work week of 65 to 68 hours. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
In Moran v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
Bremer GmbH v. ets Soules et Cie and Anthony G Scott [1985] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 160 Disputes arose in connection with Bremer’s sale of US soya bean meal to Soules. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
While both the Supreme Court’s majority and concurring opinions thus recognize differences between the two standards, the majority (unlike the concurrence) ultimately did not view them as substantial enough to indicate that a “significant procedural advantage” is conferred by use of any categorical exemption that is subject to the unusual circumstances exception as broadly construed by appellants. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:13 am
Jing Recent Anti-SLAPP Developments Why I Support HR 4364, the Proposed Federal Anti-SLAPP Bill Griping Blogger Gets Fair Use and Anti-SLAPP Win–Sedgwick v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:42 am
At the suppression hearing, she testified that she wanted to access his laptop because [he] `would never let me use it or be near him when he was using it and I wanted to know why. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
This Court is doubtless well aware of many aspects of this split, precisely because it is also implicated in Reed v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:13 am
Changing 1 point v. 10 points in five minutes is an important cue for what I need to do; v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm
A: Bill Graham, Warren v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:42 pm
Proper standard. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:38 am
Many of the worst patents out there are easily wielded as weapons precisely because they are very broad (meaning they are often infringed) but also likely invalid (often as a result of Alice v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Among other things he heard a bang-up presentation on genomics and personalized (also known as “precision”) medicine from Paige Sensenbrenner. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm
Or, to put it slightly more precisely : Rape is the intentional, p*nile penetration of the v*gina, an*s or mouth of another without that person’s consent and without reasonable belief that that person is consenting. [read post]
