Search for: "Parker v. Parker."
Results 2361 - 2380
of 2,563
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2007, 7:57 am
Heller (07-290) and a conditional cross-petition, Parker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:49 pm
Nev. 2006) (granting Google's motion for summary judgment that it qualifies for § 512(b) safe harbor provision for system caching); Parker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954), in which the Court held that eminent domain in the redevelopment context would be reviewed as social legislation, and Hawaii Hous. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
(NCAA v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
Wade, Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Francis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:30 pm
In re-reading the DC Circuit's famous recent Second Amendment decision in Parker v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
At the same time, the Court will consider a cross-appeal, Parker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
You could already begin to see the influence of that audience when the case (then captioned Parker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
Last Thursday, The Federalist Society hosted a debate about the Second Amendment with Professor Mark Tushnet, author of Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle Over Guns and Clark Neily, plaintiffs' counsel in Parker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 9:04 am
Circuit Court ruling last March striking down the handgun ban under the Second Amendment, and a cross-petition by five city residents — Parker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 8:53 am
This reply was the final filing in the initial stage of the appeal in Parker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:26 pm
” The District opposes review of that plea (Parker v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 9:40 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Because Parker has shown that the state courts unreasonably applied Jackson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 4:00 pm
Heller (07-290), and the respondent’s cross-petition contesting the finding that five plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the ban, Parker v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 3:38 pm
residents have filed a cross-petition (Parker v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:01 pm
Today is the deadline for the District of Columbia to respond to the cross-petition in the D.C. guns case, Parker v. [read post]
Defendant asleep inside had no veto power over consent, and the police did not have to ask him first
11 Oct 2007, 5:49 am
Parker, 2007 Ill. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 6:09 am
in legal malpractice litigation.Gamiel v Curtis & Riess-Curtis, P.C. ,2007 NY Slip Op 07341 ,Decided on October 4, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department "Plaintiff's affidavit was conclusory (see Murray Hill Invs. v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 305 AD2d 228, 229 [2003]), and failed to set forth the requisite "but for" causation with respect to her legal malpractice claims (see Aquino v Kuczinski,… [read post]
