Search for: "People v. Bear"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 5,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
Re: United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
Defendant's motion to preclude impeachment evidence, People v Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 (1974), and evidence-in-chief of prior bad acts, People v Ventimiglia 52 NY2d 350 (1981), is referred to the trial court for hearings immediately prior to trial. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:45 am
” That process of identification can then be brought to bear on the “uniqueness” issue. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 2:03 pm
Supreme Court called WesternGeco v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:22 am
Some like holes in the groundLong v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
Bush v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:41 am
He relied on "the principles laid down in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 3:11 pm
The issue presented in Doe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
Alam v LB Tower Hamlets[2009] EWHC 44 (Admin) is one of those interesting cases that you get in allocations - well, interesting because a council like LB Tower Hamlets should probably know better than to have an obscure clause in its allocations scheme which surely will be challenged sooner rather than later (that it took three years is mildly surprising). [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:42 am
There’s been much written about the Fifth Circuit’s en banc ruling in Alvarez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
Alam v LB Tower Hamlets[2009] EWHC 44 (Admin) is one of those interesting cases that you get in allocations - well, interesting because a council like LB Tower Hamlets should probably know better than to have an obscure clause in its allocations scheme which surely will be challenged sooner rather than later (that it took three years is mildly surprising). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:13 pm
From today's decision by Judge Paul Oetken in Atas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:28 am
Who knows what people are thinking? [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
Here, it refers to its 1999 opinion in People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:28 pm
(Justice Brennan cited it in his dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:37 am
Briefly: Adam Winkler provides a history of gun rights at The Atlantic, concluding that Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:20 pm
This provides new and never before published evidence of why Brown v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:16 am
The court said that reasonable people in the position of the parties would expect the terms “paraplegia”, “quadriplegia”, “hemiplegia” and “triplegia” to bear their technical medical meaning. [read post]
