Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 5,568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 1:12 pm
Posted by Judy SelbyEditor's note: This is a cross-blog post with BakerHostetler’s Class Action Lawsuit Defense blog. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:29 am
Complicating the matter was a seemingly conflicting decision by the Circuit Court of neighboring Loudon County, a decision that was affirmed by the Virginia Supreme Court in Lee’s Crossing v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am
And so the Supreme Court said that while it's not OK to kill the insane, it's perfectly fine to kill crazy people as long as they aren't insane in a particular way.The Court decided Ford v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:50 pm
The Court of Appeals has found that certain industry specific artificial intelligence technology is generally accepted (People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 5:07 am
Complicating the matter was a seemingly conflicting decision by the Circuit Court of neighboring Loudon County, a decision that was affirmed by the Virginia Supreme Court in Lee’s Crossing v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:14 am
Referring to the 2012 decision of the California Intermediate appellate court in Health Net, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 8:49 am
Florida (2010) and Miller v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
Since Bush v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:27 am
The case, Sessions v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 3:36 pm
That is an adage, the Court said then in Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 8:17 am
The same holds true of Country-Wide's arguments in support of its cross motion for a stay. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:27 am
The case, Sessions v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:39 am
In Williams v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:28 pm
As a libertarian myself, I wish it were true that all of these people had suddenly bought into a broad libertarian agenda. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
Martinez wielded the court’s pre-Dickerson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
Michael appealed “the partial denial of his motion, and Pamela cross-appeals the dismissal of her harmful access by computer claim”. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:43 am
” The Supreme Court ruled that it was in Bennis v. [read post]
