Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 2,842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2011, 5:36 am
If the judiciary is unique among political offices, then term limits may be uniquely appropriate as to judges but not other political office holders. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:09 am
Relying on Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:33 pm
Berger v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:41 am
Vernor v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
See Kelo v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
See Kelo v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm
That changed in 2004, when a unanimous Supreme Court strongly affirmed its support for a balanced approach to copyright law and in the process breathed new life into the Copyright Act’s fair dealing provision in a case called Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:00 am
“The Supreme Court held in the Bartnicki (Bartnicki v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Dukes and American Electric Power v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:12 am
Corp. v Dual Mfg. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Southwest v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 11:30 pm
Last week, just before Thanksgiving, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its opinion in Airgas, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:30 am
“Intellectual property crimes are not victimless,” Holder said in a statement. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
The discussion below is based upon the Chancery Court decision in Airgas, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 11:42 am
Airgas's charter requires an affirmative vote of the holders of at least 67% of the voting power of all shares to alter, amend, or repeal the staggered board provision, or to adopt any bylaw inconsistent with that provision. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
First, before and through January 11, 2008, Schofield was the Episcopal Bishop of the Diocese of San Joaquin; on that day, his powers as Episcopal Bishop were suspended by the national church. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm
In another case this week, AT&T v. [read post]
