Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 2361 - 2380 of 55,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:57 am by CMS
In this post, David McKie, Partner, and Dany Bitar, Associate in the litigation team at CMS, preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Argentum Exploration Ltd (Respondent) v Republic of South Africa (Appellant). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
December 18, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we near the end of 2023, we have highlighted some recent industry developments that will likely impact many of our clients. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 12:48 am by Mark Keenan
These trusts are not owned outright by any beneficiary; instead, the trustees have the power to make decisions on who benefits, and when. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 8:55 pm by Cameron Harvey (AU)
Footnotes 1 Real Estate Tool Box Pty Ltd v Campaigntrack Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 38 (Real Estate Tool Box v Campaigntrack). 2 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Copyright Act). 3 Real Estate Tool Box v Campaigntrack at [64] per Gageler CJ, Gordon, Edelman, Steward and Jagot JJ. 4 Ibid. 5 Id, [65], [77]. 6 Id, [77]. 7 Id, [88]. 8 Ibid. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 8:55 pm by Cameron Harvey (AU)
Footnotes 1 Real Estate Tool Box Pty Ltd v Campaigntrack Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 38 (Real Estate Tool Box v Campaigntrack). 2 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Copyright Act). 3 Real Estate Tool Box v Campaigntrack at [64] per Gageler CJ, Gordon, Edelman, Steward and Jagot JJ. 4 Ibid. 5 Id, [65], [77]. 6 Id, [77]. 7 Id, [88]. 8 Ibid. [read post]