Search for: "S G v. J G" Results 2361 - 2380 of 3,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm by Barry Eagar
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm by tekEditor
You can substitute for all the matches on each line by adding the /g suffix: ed> 1s/i/j/g ed> p I decjded I ljke thjs ljne better. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  The judge said that “If one of the late King’s physicians had kept a diary of what he had heard and seen, this Court would not in the King’s lifetime, have permitted him to print or publish it.“ In 1849 the Queen’s consort brought proceedings to restrain the publication of surreptitiously obtained private etchings made by himself and the Queen (Prince Albert v Strange (1848-9) 2 De G & Sm 652). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by Fiscalito
No obstante, en el caso de pedimentos consolidados, se considerará además que esta información es declarada por el Agento o Apoderado Aduanal. [read post]