Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 33,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 10:56 am
By: Kara M. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:39 am
Since non-competes in California are generally unenforceable under California law, non-compete disputes involving California employees typically involve employees moving to California from another state, those working in California for a company with its principal operations in another state, or California-based employees that have signed a non-compete as part of an M&A transaction. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:38 pm
ROGERS: I'm not going to discuss the specifics of conversations with the President of the United States but I stand by the comment I just made to you. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 11:38 am
Either way, your posts are always of interest to me and I respect your views, even when I disagree with them.January 2, 2012, Rick writes: Thanks, Scott, I'm glad to hear it. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 3:08 pm
I'm calling attention to this because Wisconsin's Republican Governor was reviled for what was only a budget managing inroad on the teachers' interests. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:59 am
This past weekend's NYT Week in Review had an interesting article on how they don't make U.S. attorneys like they used to. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
TSB-M-08(3)S (May 8, 2008). [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:53 am
The post Today's Physics News appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
Second, pursuant to the Supreme Court's holding in Mesa v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:33 pm
I'm very excited that The Bronx is revolutionizing to become eco-friendly but at what cost ? [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:59 am
I’m inclined to agree with the court on this point, but I thought it interesting that a federal court, dealing with something that would likely be a federal felony (and, at the time, a state crime), specifically noted — with apparent approval — that a judge informed of the facts (if the facts were as alleged) “probably would have told Curtis [Scherr] … that this wasn’t a proper matter for a criminal proceeding. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm
Each part opens and closes with short intro and then summary sections that knit the three works together and find overall themes or trajectories, related to that of the book as a whole.I'm now ready to start Part 3 (The United States Between the Civil War and World War I, or perhaps just pre-World War I). [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Oregon Supreme Court Adopts Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data for Computer Warrants
28 Jun 2018, 11:40 pm
Put differently, when the state conducts a reasonably targeted search of a person's computer for information pursuant to a warrant that properly identifies the information being sought, the state has not unreasonably invaded the person's privacy interest, and the state may use the information identified in the warrant in a prosecution or any other lawful manner. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:33 am
I'm just shy of old enough to remember this poster, I think, but it is now officially my favorite thing about Joan Baez. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 3:20 pm
State, Court of Appeals No. 16A01-0609-CR-413 (Ind. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:24 am
Politically, this is the perfect Texas law. 71.02(a) combines the public's fear of gangs, with our state's Victorian sexual mores. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:18 pm
Lauri Mälksoo (University of Tartu), Prof. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
U of M Extension also runs a phone line in conjunction with Iowa State Extension to answer callers' questions regarding food. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:01 pm
I say this to show that I'm not a rapid Penn State booster with an ax to grind. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
Generally, Eleventh Amendment immunity also extends to state officials sued in their official capacity because in such a case the state is the real party in interest. [read post]
