Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 17,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2018, 9:44 am
It also cited its own 2011 decision in State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 12:30 am
They defended Plessy as properly interpreting the Constitution’s equality guarantee by counting states whose laws segregated education in 1868—the majority of which were states of the former Confederacy that were resisting Reconstruction. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 2:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
State, supra (quoting Deal v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
In his answer, Gershengorn cited the prevalence of conspiracy charges, and alluded to the consequences of a ruling against the government: a number of commission defendants already have pleaded guilty to standalone conspiracy counts, and to material support. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In the complaint, filed by an Indiana trademark lawyer, James Dean, Inc. asserted nine causes of action against Twitter: • Count I - Trademark Infringement Under Section 32(1) or 3(A) of the Lanham Act; • Count II - False Endorsement Under Lanham Act § 43(A); • Count III - Indiana State Statutory Right of Publicity; • Count IV - Common Law Right of Publicity; • Count V - Common Law Unfair Competition;… [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:26 pm
State from Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Presiding Judge Sharon Keller, dissenting from that court's decision not to review a lower court decision: Appellant has been charged with two counts of the offense of sending harassing electronic communications. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am
In Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:06 am
Let's count the ways: (a) In Federal Court, the admissibility of expert testimony is governed by Daubert v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 5:59 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
The case was Kostick v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:08 am
In Rose v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:19 pm
In Aguilar v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 7:25 pm
MN Court of Appeals says no refusal to submit to alcohol testing unless officer properly asked the question In a recent Minnesota Court of Appeals ruling, State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 9:01 pm
., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 7:59 am
Plaintiff pleaded guilty to one felony count of possession with intent to sell and deliver a controlled substance in 1979. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 6:23 am
At issue in the case is whether the state’s policy of not counting out-of-precinct provisional ballots violates the Voting Rights Act and whether a state law prohibiting individuals from collecting and delivering absentee ballots unjustifiably burdens the right to vote. [read post]
