Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 2361 - 2380 of 6,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
The distinctive dog deviceAzumi Ltd v Zuma's Choice Pet Products Ltd [2017] EWHC 609 is a case about a dog's purpose. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:08 am by Chris Laughton
3.3 Rule 4 (definition of pre-pack): We are concerned that this definition could lead to the decision on TUPE in OTG v Barke being overturned in respect of pre-pack sales. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
Under section 20(1)(a) Trade-Marks Act (RSC 1985, c T-13)(TM Act), trade mark infringement requires a valid trade mark registration, a ‘use’ in the sense of the Act (sale, distribution or advertisement), a confusing sign in relation to any goods and services in a commercial context without entitlement or authorisation. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
Under section 20(1)(a) Trade-Marks Act (RSC 1985, c T-13)(TM Act), trade mark infringement requires a valid trade mark registration, a ‘use’ in the sense of the Act (sale, distribution or advertisement), a confusing sign in relation to any goods and services in a commercial context without entitlement or authorisation. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:07 am
 This case is the direct result of the Court's 1992 opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 6:22 am by Legal Reader
This has directly related to AndroGel’s sales increasing to over $1.37 billion per year.5. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
A History of Copyright | That was exhausting: sale of individual bracelet link infringes trade mark | Do tapirs look like pigs? [read post]