Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 3,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 5:10 am
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:57 pm
Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:54 am
Sharp Mfg. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm
We have already posted on Mrs Justice Sharp’s important judgment in DFT v TFD – available on Bailii [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB). [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
But, if Levitt v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 5:08 pm
In last week's Widdison v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm
Speaking at the press conference, Trump reaffirmed Article V of NATO, committing the United States to the alliance’s promise of collective self-defense. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:31 am
The defendants would like to escape her jurisdiction by means of a transfer to the Northern District of Texas, and Continental's motion for an antisuit injunction has been fully briefed (in other posts I discussed Nokia's German anti-antisuit injunction and Continental's reply brief, which mentions five German Sharp v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:21 am
Rose and Brooks’s work, though, convinces me the line between the two theories is not nearly so sharp as I had thought. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 8:44 pm
(That’s the “it’s false” prong.)Or consider variations on the widely known case of Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
A smiling TV 2 Norway (new owner of C More) CEO possibly pictured before the CJEU rulingLast week this blog reported on the latest decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the right of communication/making available to the public within Article 3 of the InfoSoc Directive, this being C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg, C-279/13.BackgroundAs readers will remember, this was yet another reference for a preliminary ruling from seemingly… [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
The level of attention of the relevant consumer may vary according to the category of goods or services in question and the average consumer only rarely has the chance to make a direct comparison between the marks but must place his trust in the imperfect picture of them that he has kept in his mind (T-186/02, BMI Bertollo v OHMI).By taking into account the identity of the goods, the average degree of visual similarity and the conceptual identity between the signs, the normal level of… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:23 am
Contrary to those accounts, Brown v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
The case, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:01 am
Further, chevrons or V-shaped marks can be presented in multiple ways showing different characteristics, e.g. , , , . [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 1:47 am
This enforcement trend is accompanied by a sharp rise in the number of patents applied for in Europe, making it more difficult to filter them during examination. [read post]
