Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 2361 - 2380 of 10,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 5:03 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
In so concluding, the Court ruled that Blanton, the plaintiff employee of a Domino’s franchisee, had adequately pled that Domino’s used the franchise agreements to orchestrate a conspiracy among their franchisees to not compete for labor; Blanton says that the no-hire provision is evidence of that conspiracy and violates the Sherman Antitrust Act because it unreasonably restrains competition for Domino’s franchise employees and depresses employee wages, lessens employee benefits,… [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 2:17 pm by Claire R. Cahoon
 In the redacted case of United States v. ______, the Sixth Circuit addressed a sentencing reduction given to a defendant who provided substantial assistance in the investigation and prosecution of a murder case unrelated to his federal charges. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Baum Memorial Lecture: Why Excluding Same-Sex Couples from Civil Marriage Violates the Constitutional Law of the United States, (University of Illinois Law Review, 2014, Forthcoming).Brian Christopher Jones, SCOTUS Short Title Turmoil: Time for a Congressional Bill Naming Authority, (32(1) Yale Law & Policy Review Inter Alia 25-33 (2013)).Andrew A. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:30 am by John L. Welch
There was nothing to show that the film has been shown on television or distributed on DVD in the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But when plaintiff returned, defendants initiated disciplinary proceedings again, the investigating officer ruled against him, determining he lacks the "attributes essential to lead as an officer of the United States Army. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:30 am by Unknown
Using Values to Depolarise (European Union, 2020) [text]Resource:New Series from IOM [access]- Short "think pieces, written by our High-Level Advisers, on the potential changes, impacts and implications for migration and mobility arising from COVID19. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:22 am by David Oscar Markus
Here, Defendant asserts that, under Brady v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:24 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]