Search for: "Smith v. People"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 3,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:22 am
(Ratzlaf v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
One of those cases, Smith v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Smith: Reinstates right to effective counsel in capital cases when counsel does not present mitigating evidence during the sentencing phase. 2009 Montejo v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
Jack Smith took the position that the President isn’t immune to anything, and the Trump people took the position that the president’s immune from everything. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:10 pm
1994); People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:17 am
Palmore v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am
Smith trips but is unharmed; however he is delayed by the stumble and therefore steps outside just as a gargoyle detaches from the building and falls on him. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
Supreme Court ruling in the case of Employment Division v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:45 am
Nguyen v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am
Smith, discusses the immutable aspect of gang membership. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On the same day Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:35 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority in Smith, the First Amendment has never been a license to be a law unto oneself. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
Carey v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
Smith, 105 F. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in Horne v. [read post]
