Search for: "Stanford Law Review"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
A new study by Stanford law professor John Donohue analyzed all murder cases in that state over a 34-year period and found that there is no rational distinction between inmates on death row and the equally violent offenders who were not sentenced to death. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
The Court’s announcement that it had granted review in Friedrichs v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am
In the matter of an application by James Hugh Allister and others for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Clifford Peoples for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 30 November – 1 December [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:49 am
Partnering with Stanford Codex for new, exciting, “disruptive” companies. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:09 pm
Due to conference travel, I missed the Stanford Law Review's Festschrift for my wonderful colleague Dick Craswell: Who Knows? [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm
[We have the following announcement of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review’s symposium for Volume 173 The Uses (and Misuses) of History in Constitutional Interpretation. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 5:46 am
The states try to get around this by pointing to the alleged inseverability of the rest of the ACA, but that doesn't work either (for reasons Kevin Walsh pointed out in this Stanford Law Review article at pp. 75-77). [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
The Texas Law Review, which has displayed impeccable taste in IP articles, focused its 2014 symposium issue on the topic "Steps Toward Evidence-Based IP. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 5:46 am
The states try to get around this by pointing to the alleged inseverability of the rest of the ACA, but that doesn't work either (for reasons Kevin Walsh pointed out in this Stanford Law Review article at pp. 75-77). [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:47 am
Here’s a summary of the key problems with the bill, explained in detail in our recent article in the Stanford Law Review Online, New Republican Bill is Network Neutrality in Name Only. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:47 am
Here’s a summary of the key problems with the bill, explained in detail in our recent article in the Stanford Law Review Online, New Republican Bill is Network Neutrality in Name Only. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:47 am
Here’s a summary of the key problems with the bill, explained in detail in our recent article in the Stanford Law Review Online, New Republican Bill is Network Neutrality in Name Only. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:15 pm
The petitioners are represented by Foster and Barbara Olshansky, legal director of the International Justice Network, and the international human rights law clinics at Stanford University and Yale Law School. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Supreme Court's recently completed Term, by the noted constitutional law scholar and former Stanford Law School dean, Kathleen Sullivan (top right); and a speech by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano (center right). [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 4:55 pm
"The biggest problem with the Bilski decision, said Stanford University law professor Mark A. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:53 am
Recently posted to SSRN: "'And I Can See Through Your Brain': Access to Experts, Competency to Consent, and the Impact of Antipsychotic Medications in Neuroimaging Cases in the Criminal Trial Process" Stanford Technology Law Review, ForthcomingNYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08/09 #20 MICHAEL L. [read post]
10 May 2013, 12:14 am
* Common barriers http://bit.ly/11GPpJe [Part One] Debra Beck: Problem-finding: What boards need http://bit.ly/13WnOFM [Part Two] Emily Chan: California May Introduce Social Impact Bonds via Nonprofit Law Matters http://flip.it/H5TzD Stanford Social Innovation Review: Scaling is easier said than done. [read post]
28 May 2012, 6:59 am
” (On this brief, Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society.) [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:07 am
The study will be posted today by the Social Science Research Network, www.ssrn.com, and published in November in the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 11:28 pm
The problem with Hwang's second paper was first dismissed as an inadvertent mix-up of photos.Recall also that the Stanford Law Review never corrected the false statement that Gary Boone invented the integrated circuit. [read post]
