Search for: "State v. Brain "
Results 2361 - 2380
of 2,675
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
The delay in care left the boy with permanent brain damage, plaintiff Gloria Lopez says. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 1:09 pm
It focused heavily on the Twombly decision, and on a more recent sequel (Pacific Bell v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 11:16 pm
Viens (Queen Mary, University of London) The Neuroscience of Fair Play: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Altruistic Behaviours and Their FailuresDonald Pfaff (Rockefeller University, New York) Brain Images As Legal EvidenceAdina Roskies and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Dartmouth College) 13.15 LUNCH 14:15 SESSION III: The Illusion of Intentionality and Its Implications for Criminal LawColin Blakemore (Nuffield Department of Clinical Sciences, Oxford University)… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
Hilen v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
The Massachusetts statute authorizing the use of state forensic examiners specifically states that all reports produced by these individuals are sworn statements to be created “for the enforcement of law. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:11 am
" http://www.kentucky.com/news/state/v-print/story/832118.html Bahe Cook Cantley and Jones personal injury lawyer Larry Jones said that the news is devastating, especially since so many pool deaths are preventable. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 1:59 pm
United States, a U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 2:39 pm
" VWC File No. 229-99-31, Arthur Pierce v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:53 pm
State of New Mexico v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 10:33 am
It would be confusing for the defense to suggest to the jury that the parents/relatives may, at no cost, provide those services and misleading to the jury in view of the current state of the law regarding Plaintiff's damages as referred to earlier under the case of Hanif v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:13 pm
In today’s case (Moskaleva v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 8:24 pm
What was interesting about this case (Polovnikoff v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Pereira v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:22 am
Roness v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
Ideology v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 12:33 am
And as the USE NOTE states in BAJI, [t]his instruction, and the Comment thereto, were approved in Espinosa v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:53 am
Yet in one recent Michigan worker's compensation opinion, Sunitha Atluri v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 3:07 am
Scott v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:42 pm
The Supreme Court issued a per curiam decision this morning in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
