Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
The judicial trend in respect of both has been in favour of allowing the right to manage to be acquired, so far as possible (Exhibit 1 for qualifying criteria: Gala Unity v Ariadne Road; Exhibit 2 for procedure: Avon Freeholds v Regent Court RTM).I now present for your delectation a veritable plethora of decisions of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), of varying degrees of freshness, addressing both the qualifying criteria and the procedural requirements… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
The judicial trend in respect of both has been in favour of allowing the right to manage to be acquired, so far as possible (Exhibit 1 for qualifying criteria: Gala Unity v Ariadne Road; Exhibit 2 for procedure: Avon Freeholds v Regent Court RTM).I now present for your delectation a veritable plethora of decisions of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), of varying degrees of freshness, addressing both the qualifying criteria and the procedural requirements… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:29 am
The lower court upheld the Secretary of State's Order, and the officers appealed once again. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 3:09 am
In his opinion in Valinote v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 11:57 am
I’m not sure if Graziosi will appeal the ruling, but like the initial Bland v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am
(David Kopel) To me, today’s decision of the United States District Court for the District of Utah in Brown v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:43 am
I started this blog stating that I am an advocate of parties resolving their divorce and custody disputes. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:56 pm
In October a different panel of judges of the same court -- the Munich I Regional Court -- also held a trial over two other Nokia v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:51 am
Reversing the district court’s dismissal of her claims on summary judgment, the appeals court ruled that she presented sufficient evidence of pretext and that her disclosures were protected under the WPA as originally enacted in 1989 (Kerr v Jewell, December 9, 2013, per curiam). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 5:50 am
Stuart, 797 N.E.2d 28 (Court of Appeals of New York(2003)). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
Case T‑394/10, Elena Grebenshikova v OHIM, Volvo Trademark Holding AB intervening, is a fascinating decision of the General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) on 5 December. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
The Dallas Court of Appeals dealt with this issue in 1970, in the case styled, Foundation Reserve Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:38 pm
On November 19th the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) ruled on the scope of a contractual non-exclusive jurisdiction clause in the context of a damage claim for breach of EU competition law (Ryanair Ltd v Esso Italiana Srl [2013] EWCA Civ 1450). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm
Engle, associate director of the Advertising Practices Division at the Federal Trade Commission, sums it up this way: “In a traditional ad with a celebrity, everyone assumes that they are being paid.12 When it’s not obvious that it is an ad, people should disclose that they are being paid. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:06 am
The content of plaintiff's speech was strictly personal, the Court of Appeals (Parker, Hall and Livingston) says. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:45 am
Take, for example, Alizio v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
CARTER v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
On appeal to the U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
It's much harder to argue to an appeals court that two juries in a row were unreasonable than to say the same about a single jury.From a strategic point of view, Apple actually scored an even more important victory over Samsung on Monday with an appeals court ruling that the district court had erred in denying Apple a permanent injunction against infringing Samsung products, giving Apple a new opportunity to obtain an injunction on remand to the district… [read post]
