Search for: "State v. Dallas" Results 2361 - 2380 of 2,595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Gotcher is an Investigator with the United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) in the Dallas Regional Office. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:11 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  OPINION DELIVERED: December 16, 2011    Full case style and lower-court info: AMERICO LIFE, INC., AMERICO FINANCIAL LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, GREAT SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE OHIO STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL FARMERS' UNION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 The likelihood of state statutory or regulatory restrictions on insured arrangements is particularly likely because of the heavy regulation of these products by states including the widespread incorporation of ACA mandates into state insurance laws and regulations in response to the Market Reform provisions of the ACA. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
Family Voices Coordinators participate in several groups within the state, including Title V/CSHCN, DD Council, Part C agency, CHIP board and parent and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
 To the extent the Judicial Conference guidance purports to address this problem it only states that the JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet should state "the remedy sought has implication beyond the parties before the court or that the case seeks to bar or mandate statewide or nationwide enforcement of a state of federal law. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
That one way is spelled out, in very clear words, in Article V of ECUSA's Constitution, and it has not changed in over 200 years. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm by John Floyd
Osborne that held a state prisoner does not have a due process right to obtain evidence from the state that could establish his actual innocence. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, the Supreme Court is conferring this very day about whether to take up Baker v. [read post]