Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 7,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
by Dennis Crouch In WesternGeco v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
A parallel Huawei v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
Holder 13-323Issue: Whether 8 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
” An early decision stated that the Panel could perform “limited modest factual research,” InfoSpace.com, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 8:06 am
Those new restrictions were imposed by the Commission measure and the member States implementing it were left with no discretion as to how to apply it (see, Case C-386/96 P Dreyfus v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:03 pm
Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Roberts stated, “Mapping a cellphone’s location over the course of 127 days provides an all-encompassing record of the holder’s whereabouts. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:03 pm
Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Roberts stated, “Mapping a cellphone’s location over the course of 127 days provides an all-encompassing record of the holder’s whereabouts. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Must Articles 17 and 19 of Directive 98/71 be interpreted as meaning that the discretion accorded to the Member State to establish independently the extent to which, and the conditions under which, protection is conferred may include discretion to preclude such protection where a third party - without authorisation from the design copyright holder - has already produced and marketed in that State products based on the designs in question, where protection is precluded… [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:31 am
Holder and Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:14 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
The expert near-consensus on this subject is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:58 am
In another case, however, DoJ declined to change course, and instead adhered to the wrongheaded position of the Bush administration.The other case is District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
Since our client resided in North Olmsted, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:37 am
Since our client resided in Medina, OH, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:26 pm
Since our client resided in Fostoria Ohio, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:12 pm
Since our client resided in Chicago, IL, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 5:21 am
Since our client resided in Cleveland, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:33 am
Holder, 602 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2010).) [read post]
