Search for: "State v. Main" Results 2361 - 2380 of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2010, 5:12 pm by Dale Carpenter
The main gay civil rights groups in Minnesota are not supporting this litigation. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Josh Blackman
Today, the Supreme Court issued an order on the emergency docket in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
And at this particular moment in time, commemorating the hundredth anniversary of the Los Angeles Aqueduct that would threaten the lake and the twentieth anniversary of the State Water Board’s ultimate decision to save it, the Mono Lake story is especially worth revisiting.Part II introduces the main cast of characters in the Mono Lake story, starting with the public trust and prior appropriations doctrines around which the legal controversy unfolds. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
  In the Abdi case, which I’d discussed on Thursday, I’d filed a motion with the court of appeals right after State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 10:32 pm by Jonathan
On June 7, 2010, the United States Supreme Court released its decision in the case of Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
The IPKat is always delighted to receive IP-related news from outside Europe and the US, which tends to be the main focus of the blog. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by Bruce Ackerman
" This simply isn't true, regardless of whether the Supreme Court upholds or undermines the decision by Colorado (and Maine and other states) to exclude Trump under the Disqualification Clasue. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
This suggests that in such situations the State may attempt to have the case dismissed on the grounds that it immune from suit in federal court for alleged violations of Title VII in view of the rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 and Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, cases involving employees suing their state employer in federal court for alleged violations of, respectively, the Age… [read post]