Search for: "State v. R. E. J"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 2,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2009, 2:49 pm
Section 4581(e), the constrained tone of the majority opinion -- and the strong dissent by Senior Judge James J. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 3:07 pm
Katherine J. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for… [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Div. 2008); Doe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
BUSINESS HIGHWAY 65 BRANSON MO-Missouri 28 COUNTRY MART 1447 STATE HWY. 248 SUITE J BRANSON MO-Missouri 29 SUN FEST MARKET 225 CROSS CREEK BOULEVARD SUITE 1 BRANSON MO-Missouri 30 JUBILEE 2210 WEST STATE HIGHWAY 76 BRANSON MO-Missouri 31 COUNTRY MART HIGHWAY 13 & 76 P.O. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
J. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP Watchdog) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual Property Watch) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (IAM) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Baristas) (PatentBIOtech) (Patent Docs) USPTO news: E-Commerce alert – tips to improve your e-filing effectiveness (Patent Docs) IP protection in the US fashion industry (IP Osgoode) (IP Osgoode) US General – Decisions California Supreme Court reaffirms strong public policy against covenants not… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Inability to demonstrate the possession of a required license permits the summary termination of an incumbentMatter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2009 NY Slip Op 51164(U), Decided on May 15, 2009, Supreme Court, Erie County, Judge Paula L. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management (IP… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
[pdf] View E-Briefs in THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
The fact that this is an electronic publication permits the user to locate information in the database by using key words and phrases.You may order your copy of The Section 207-a/c Case Book by sending your name, the name of your organization, your mailing address and telephone number, purchase order number, confirmation of your tax exempt status, if appropriate, and your e-mail address to:Publications@nycap.rr.comor you may mail your organization's purchase order form to:Public… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 4:55 pm
Section 4581(e) in the case of Gaudio v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
(e) in Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] 3 WLR 636, the House of Lords had concluded that, in order to raise an exceptional defence of the sort contemplated in Kay, the defendant would have to show that the decision to seek possession was Wednesbury unreasonable. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:42 pm
Also, Frank J. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor) New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist) United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat) United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney… [read post]
