Search for: "State v. So "
Results 2361 - 2380
of 117,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 11:15 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
It did so, for example, in Breard v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
It did so, for example, in Breard v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
It did so, for example, in Breard v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
So the State’s view of the law is just like Westlaw’s view of the law. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:22 pm
So far as the Constitution is concerned, a state civil penalty could be adjudicated by an administrative agency. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Predicting the Fallout from King v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm
The power district asked the Supreme Court to review that ruling, and today the justices agreed to do so. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:39 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:41 am
If so, in what circumstances (if any) may a Member State be relieved of that obligation? [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am
As the Court said there, “Parody needs to mimic an original to make its point, and so has some claim to use the creation of its victim’s (or collective victims’) imagination, whereas satire can stand on its own two feet and so requires justification for the very act of borrowing. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm
So far as I am aware, its first juridical use was in Roberson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
In doing so, the Court had this to say about Concepcion: We invited the parties to provide their comments on the recent United States Supreme Court case, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:37 am
Banxcorp v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:30 am
On appeal from: [2018] UKUT 355 (AAC) This case considered the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58 upon the decision-makers in the housing benefit system and the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal hearing appeals from local authority decisions – in claims relating to periods before the regulations governing the removal of the spare room subsidy, otherwise known as the “bedroom… [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
United States, 247 F. 3d 1032 (2001) (en banc); John v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 6:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
