Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 2361 - 2380 of 20,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2008, 11:10 am
Riegel (which I still think will legislatively overturned under a President Obama) and a decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:06 am by Philip Bobbitt
Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in the landmark Supreme Court case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
  I'm still not certain that Justice Humes gets it right, but nonetheless think that the amendments definitely add some force to his conclusion.Second, as to the "burglary tools" part of the case, the Court of Appeal now reaches a different result than it did initially. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:15 pm
Blawgletter reported yesterday about the Supreme Court's accepting review of the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
As Justice Harlan’s dissent pointed out, the power of laissez-faire theories and the belief in minimal government interference in private business transactions was still quite strong in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. [read post]
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm by Amy Howe
” The justices also focused on whether there were exemptions to the city’s non-discrimination policy, or whether it is instead the kind of policy shielded by the court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm by Kali Borkoski
Mazda Motors of America, which Amanda covered yesterday, is still generating discussion. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Court’s 1954 ruling invalidating de jure racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:43 am by Kelly Becker
On October 19, 2010, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued its opinion in Marin et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:24 am by SHG
And not a justice of the Court deemed it worthy to dissent. [read post]