Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 15,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
According to the study, youth play a lead role in influencing friends’ choices to ride with drinking drivers. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 5:11 pm
Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:53 am
State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:12 pm
In December of 2006, the state's supreme court ruled in Evans v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
In our post-Roe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 11:18 am
Facts: This case (Redmond v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 11:18 am
Facts: This case (Redmond v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 6:22 am
Via Capital Defense Weekly: The New Mexico Supreme Court's recent opinion in State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:14 am
See 42 U.S.C. s11603(e)(2)(B); Lozano v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
Pritchett v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
Instead of conducting these post-market surveillance studies, Ethicon stopped selling the products commercially. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:48 am
This amazing legal linguistics resource was recently cited by Justice Thomas in his dissent to Carpenter v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:49 am
De Simone v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
In Shah v. [read post]
