Search for: "The Supreme Court of New Mexico"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 4,061
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In his article for The New York Times "Room for Debate" feature on whether courts should eliminate human court reporters (spurred by the chaos caused by the recent resignation of a drug-addicted court reporter in New York), U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In his article for The New York Times "Room for Debate" feature on whether courts should eliminate human court reporters (spurred by the chaos caused by the recent resignation of a drug-addicted court reporter in New York), U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In his article for The New York Times "Room for Debate" feature on whether courts should eliminate human court reporters (spurred by the chaos caused by the recent resignation of a drug-addicted court reporter in New York), U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In his article for The New York Times "Room for Debate" feature on whether courts should eliminate human court reporters (spurred by the chaos caused by the recent resignation of a drug-addicted court reporter in New York), U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
In so doing, the US Supreme Court said that it would not review the decision of the New Mexico Supreme Court that refusing to photograph the same-sex ceremony was a violation of New Mexico’s public accommodations law, which prevents discrimination by those who offer their services to the public. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 10:24 am
The New Mexico Supreme Court [official website] ruled on Monday that the state must recognize the tribal status of the Fort Sill Apache [official website]. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
The enlarged pool of available photographers in New Mexico thus increases the potential for irony. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Willock, in which the owners of a New Mexico photography business were asking the Court to review their claim that a requirement to photograph a same-sex couple’s commitment ceremony violated their First Amendment rights, Christopher Schmidt of ISCOTUSnow looks at earlier cases involving similar claims. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:55 pm
This was an issue of New Mexico law, and therefore not reviewable by the Supreme Court, but I think other courts would do well to draw a different line. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
"... turning aside the appeal of a New Mexico photography studio and its owners. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
The Supreme Court refused on Monday to be drawn into the spreading controversy over the right of business firms to refuse to serve gay and lesbian customers, turning aside the appeal of a New Mexico photography studio and its owners. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:14 am
Today the Supreme Court turned away a photography business's claim that it had a First Amendment right to break New Mexico public accommodations law and discriminate against gay customers. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:51 am
In the case, the New Mexico Supreme Court held that the New Mexico Human Rights Act requires a commercial photography business to serve same-sex couples on the same basis as opposite-sex couples. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:31 pm
Recently, in California, our Supreme Court decided to give the green light to prosecutors to pursue DUI murder charges – also known as Watson Murders. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:13 am
The New Mexico Supreme Court declared it a "meaningless symbol." [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:39 pm
Supreme Court in NML v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:35 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:55 am
<> Supreme Court Rejects Coal Industry Attack on the EPA's Power to Protect Clean Water – Earthjustice: "Refuses to hear baseless case against the EPA for blocking extreme WV mountaintop removal mine" Today the Supreme Court denied the coal mining industry's request to hear a case against U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 5:29 am
Willock, in which a New Mexico couple is asking the Court to weigh in on whether they can be required to take photographs of a same-sex commitment ceremony, even if it would violate their First Amendment rights. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 4:42 am
By the reasoning of the New Mexico Supreme Court, the writer has violated the law because his refusal to write the press release is discrimination based on religion — much as Elaine Huguenin’s refusal to photograph an event with which she disagreed [a same-sex commitment ceremony] was treated as violating the law. [read post]
