Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 7,493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, there was a major kerfuffle about whether the court had jurisdiction. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:27 am
In coming to its decision, the court held that the policy at issue was subject to ERISA after finding that it satisfied all components of a three-step analysis set out by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:27 am
In coming to its decision, the court held that the policy at issue was subject to ERISA after finding that it satisfied all components of a three-step analysis set out by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:34 pm
A panel of the Tenth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:59 pm
The notice followed the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in ACA International v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Amy Lee Rosen reports that a “Third Circuit ruling on appeal to the Supreme Court that prevented an electricity supplier from claiming a double deduction on a consolidated tax return has some practitioners worried that, if accepted, the justices could solidify a stand-alone tax doctrine previously used only as a method of statutory interpretation. [read post]
19 May 2018, 1:30 pm
United States is an important decision from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.The issue presented is whether, when making a scope determination, Commerce should apply the traditional substantial transformation test to determine the origin of the merchandise that was partially manufactured in a country subject to the order and partially manufactured outside that country. [read post]
19 May 2018, 12:09 pm
But things are the way they are for the purposes of this U.S. case, so the focus is just on damages, and the single most important question in this regard is what "article of manufacture" a disgorgement of Samsung's profits should be based on: the entire device (which was considered a foregone conclusion in previous trials, but the Supreme Court and, previously, the United States Department of Justice disagreed with Judge Koh, the United… [read post]
18 May 2018, 1:08 pm
The district court dismissed or rejected all the claims, including the two federal claims which Neal appealed to the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:26 pm
His participation in the 2016 Republican primary led to state election commission proceedings in five states (Illinois, Indiana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, and New York); lawsuits in six state courts (Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont); and lawsuits in six federal courts (Northern District of Alabama, Eastern District of Arkansas, District of New Hampshire, Eastern District of New York, Southern District of Texas (with… [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:03 am
In a case currently in front of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:48 am
Earlier this month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a written opinion in a Virginia car accident case discussing whether a third party’s insurance policy covered the plaintiffs’ accident. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:48 am
Earlier this month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a written opinion in a Virginia car accident case discussing whether a third party’s insurance policy covered the plaintiffs’ accident. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:21 pm
United States. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:51 am
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit affirmed. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:37 am
Circuit (and, potentially, the Supreme Court). [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Applying the Third Circuit’s six-factor test, the court observed that under the terms of the driver addendum, UberBLACK drivers were considered independent contractors. [read post]
