Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 2361 - 2380 of 4,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
  Perrigo Company and Perrigo Israel (collectively, "Perrigo") are pharmaceutical companies that develop, manufacture, market and distribute generic pharmaceutical products for sale throughout the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm by Margaret Wood
United States, was heard before the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:53 am by Scott Riddle
All of the amounts required to be paid by this Code section shall be paid in lawful money of the United States to the purchaser at the tax sale or to the purchaser’s successors. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:22 am by David Oscar Markus
Here, Defendant asserts that, under Brady v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
On March 20, 2013 Microsoft requested permission to submit an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on the standard-essential patents (SEPs) part of the "Posner appeal" (Apple v. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells shared the Chairman’s mark, and I shared the transcript of the debate over a defeated amendment that would have permitted GTMO detainees to be transferred to facilities in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
And as we saw in the Boston Marathon bombing incident, home-grown terrorists or terrorists who are sleeper cells inside the United States are a threat. . . [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am by Tom Goldstein
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am by Allison Trzop
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:21 am by Steven Koprince
The United States, No. 11-607C (2013) involved a BPA issued by the Forest Service for the purchase of crew carrier buses. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 2:09 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) has just ordered a U.S. import ban against older iPhones and iPads which were found to infringe a cellular standard-esential patent (SEP) asserted by Samsung, U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Perry and United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm by Florian Mueller
But some people want the Federal Circuit to destroy intellectual property with a hammer only to deprive itself and all other courts in the United States of the opportunity to decide on interoperability based on what happens to an API after its creation and on what a defendant wants to do with it and to it.The EFF's submissions are, of course, consistent with Google's appellate brief, which even argued that intellectual property protection can be lost over time, mentioning Aspirin… [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:54 am by Amanda Frost
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (public sector union fees); and United States v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:13 am by Gene Quinn
Since the United States Supreme Court first addressed the patentability of computer software in Gottschalk v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 2:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States (District Court docket 13-777) will be heard by U.S. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
A week ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in a snowplow patent case, Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]