Search for: "Young v. Ins*" Results 2361 - 2380 of 7,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2020, 11:46 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Many of their assaults, in the form of exclusionary policy language, were rebuffed — see Young v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 6:38 am by admin
Permitted Cannabis Promotions Subject to the federal Cannabis Regulations, authorized producers, sellers or distributors may promote cannabis if the promotion is: (i) addressed and sent to an individual who is 18 years of age or older and identified by name; (ii) in a place where young persons are not permitted by law; (iii) by means of telecommunication if reasonable steps have been taken to prevent access by a young person (e.g., an age-gated website); (iv) in a prescribed place;… [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:27 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
In a significant pro-whistleblower decision yesterday, the Tax Court in a decision 144 TC 15 (Whistleblower 21276-13W v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:20 am
   The complaint, filed in Feminists Choosing Life of New York v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 2:18 pm
  Well, thanks to the irrepressible Chief Judge Kozinski, we now have citeworthy precedent from Clement v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:56 pm by WCK Director
Worker Injured Attempting to Retrieve a Bag of Chips Stuck in Vending Machine Receives Award of Benefits  In Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:57 pm
The cost to Philip Morris of trying to slant jury instructions too far in its favor -- $79.5 million in punitive damages: As I first noted in this post from this morning, today the Supreme Court of Oregon issued its ruling, on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, in Williams v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Post-mortem moral rights in PolandMoral rights are back on stage again as Jeremy gives the floor to Katfriend and enthusiastic young lawyer Ewa Laskowska. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
In its landmark 2005 decision in Roper v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
He describes the case of Samantha Elauf, a young Muslim woman who applied for a job with the fashionable clothing chain. [read post]