Search for: ""duty to warn""
Results 221 - 240
of 1,394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 11:45 pm
The cruise ship did not supervise the operation and had no duty to warn passengers of possible dangers in such a trip, as the dangers are obvious the court held. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 4:37 pm
The case resulted in one of the leading decisions explaining the cruise line's legal obligation to warn of dangers ashore in the ports of call where it frequents - Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals: Cruise Lines Have Duty to Warn of Danger of Crime in Ports of Call. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:35 am
We think the court's preemption analysis would be of interest to our readers, but since the defendant is a Reed Smith client (although not in the Pinsonneault case), our description is bare bones, with no commentary:Product involved: PMA approved pacemaker leads.Procedural posture: Plaintiffs' motion to amend largely denied (all newly alleged causes of action denied).Reasoning: (1) Failure to warn claim predicated on allegations of failure to report adverse events… [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
Laura Huenneke and spent the rest of the morning attending two presentations: Mental Health First Aid and legal updates on “Duty to Warn” in Arizona. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
The court dismissed the negligent failure-to-warn claim, noting that it was well-settled Pennsylvania law that pharmaceutical companies due to owe a duty to warn the public. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 7:49 am
Cruising is not considered by the courts to be just "point to point" transportation, as in the case of the airline industry which has no duty to warn of crime in a destination the passenger picks to vacation. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
The Defendants filed Preliminary Objections asserting that there was no duty to warn or to protect the Plaintiff from the shooter under the Mental Health Procedures Act. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:09 pm
Business and property owners in Florida have a duty to warn all patrons and visitors to their property of any dangerous conditions. [read post]
6 May 2014, 6:01 am
Disclosure pervades tort law (“duty to warn”), consumer protection (“truth in lending”), bioethics and health care (“informed consent”), online contracting (“opportunity to read”), food law (“nutrition data”), campaign finance regulation, privacy protection, insurance regulation, and more. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:46 pm
The Court said that while a property owner does have a duty to warn an independent contractor of concealed and hazardous conditions on its real property, a property owner does not have a duty to warn an independent contractor about the hazards of the contractor's own work. 2. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 5:58 pm
California courts will not impose a duty to warn on a manufacturer where the manufacturer's product “did not cause or create the risk of harm. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 6:01 am
In Briscoe I, this Court noted that with respect to the fiduciary duty set forth in ERISA, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 7:51 am
Failing this, the property owner must offer adequate warning. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:10 am
If a drug maker fails to perform this basic duty, it can be held legally responsible for the harm it caused and required to pay all of the costs and damages of its victims. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 1:09 am
” • “[A] manufacturer’s duty is to warn only of those dangers it knows of or [that] are reasonably foreseeable. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:51 am
The court’s analysis turned on the issue of the duty owed by the team to the fan, who was an “invitee” meaning he was invited onto the premises. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
Just like commercial property owners, private property owners owe a duty to those on their property to address potentially dangerous conditions or, alternatively, to warn of them. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 2:39 pm
Dr. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:30 pm
Do Psychologists Have A Duty To Warn About A Potentially Violent Patient? [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 8:24 am
When the product at issue is a prescription drug, however, the drug manufacturer does not have a duty to warn patients of potential dangers of a product directly, but instead has a duty to warn the patient’s doctor instead. [read post]
