Search for: "*king v. Jackson"
Results 221 - 240
of 343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm
The sole African-American employee in the processing area of a steel plant was subjected to egregious racial harassment by coworkers and supervisors, including liberal use of the n-word and other slurs, KKK and King Kong graffiti, stuffed monkeys hanging on nooses, and a death threat (Turley v ISG Lackawanna, Inc, January 11, 2013). [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The Press Gazette reports that news agency boss Michael Leidig has lost his bid to sue Buzzfeed over a 5,000-word article published by the news website in 2015 which dubbed him “The king of bullshit news”. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 pm
I would strongly hope that a truly honest dissent would begin as follows: "Roe v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:05 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:38 am
On Wednesday, March 22, the eight-justice court will hear argument in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-8663, King v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
In The Mortgage Specialists, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Famous Trials 1 v. (193?) [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:11 am
King Solomon couldn't have created a better setup. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:32 am
Judgment was reserved but it has now been given: Guardian News and Media v The Executor of HRH The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh [2022] EWCA Civ 1081. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
The problem of selecting what to include might be compared to Peter Jackson’s conundrum in deciding what to include in his Lord of the Rings movies and what to cut. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
On Wednesday, in State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB)(King J). [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
He dismissed the claim for state immunity brought by the former King of Spain. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 7:24 pm
Probate Lawyers said the question presented on this record is whether the trusts created by the will of CMR, dated June 27, 1867, are valid within the law of perpetuities, or are void for remoteness. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:26 pm
A Probate Lawyer said the question presented on this record is whether the trusts created by the will of CMR, dated June 27, 1867, are valid within the law of perpetuities, or are void for remoteness. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:07 pm
The most detailed explanation is in a case called Martin Luther King Junior Elementary School Children v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
IPSO IPSO has issued a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 03743-18 Purcell v metro.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03195-18 Purcell v Hackney Gazette, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03194-18 Purcell v The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03180-18 Purcell v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation Resolution… [read post]
