Search for: "A D v. State of Indiana" Results 221 - 240 of 1,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2022, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
The issues here are of course not the same as in Friday's Indiana state court decision that Indiana RFRA provides religious exemptions from the state's abortion ban, but I thought I'd pass along this decision alongside the other one. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:58 am by Beck, et al.
It so happens that Indiana was on that list:Indiana: Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:47 am
State of Indiana, a 5-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Dickson writes:The defendant, William T. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 2:54 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals say no in Garcia-Torres v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 3:31 pm
State of Indiana (ILB entry here, 4th case, is the subject of a story today by Sophia Voravong in the Lafayette Journal Courier. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
The case tested the limits of the First Amendment, questioning whether state laws prohibiting complete nudity in public—in particular, dancing nude at an Indiana strip club—violated the right to freedom of expression. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:19 am by Don Asher
  This is recognized as a “lost wages” claim under both Illinois and Indiana state law. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 11:43 am
State, a NFP opinion dated Oct. 31, 2007, where the COA wrote:Brian Tyler appeals his convictions of vicarious sexual gratification as a Class D felony and two counts of Class A felony child molesting. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:46 am by SHG
The bright line, speed limit v. speed driver was driving, could not have been simpler, anyplace but Indiana, apparently. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen The Center for Intellectual Property Research at Indiana University Maurer School of Law is sponsoring three conferences this fall on the state of patent law. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 3:13 pm
Marty nicely describes the paucity of evidence supporting Indiana's claim in Crawford v. [read post]