Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 221 - 240
of 11,596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2024, 4:09 am
How do you think this appeal came out? [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
Pending appeal, it is not clear whether the government will continue to enforce the CTA against non-parties to the lawsuit, or what other impact this ruling will have nationally on entities subject to the CTA’s reporting requirements. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:40 am
But I will also focus on some issues that leapt out to me on my first few times reading it.In a nutshell, it does a better job than the discussion paper first floated years ago by not lumping all kinds of “online harms” into one bucket and treating them all the same. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 4:20 am
The petitioner applied for leave to appeal the judgment and in Re St. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:01 am
” = = = Ex parte Mitchell, Appeal 2023-003309 (P.T.A.B. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
Continue reading → [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
United States, the protester challenged the North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS”) code designation chosen by the agency and affirmed by the SBA Office of Hearing and Appeals (“OHA”).[2]The Court agreed with the protester that the NAICS code for environmental consulting services, rather than the NAICS code for research and development (“R&D”), was not the best choice. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
The applicant appealed to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; the PTAB affirmed the examiner’s decision. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
The PTAB affirmed the Examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:54 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board affirmed on appeal, agreeing with the Examining Attorney that the “applicant would be hard-put to present the term in a less prominent manner. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:02 pm
Data from Beijing revealed that plaintiffs were 5.08 times more likely to appeal or file a new suit over the same issue when chief officials made court appearances. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
But even taking this difference into account, Justice Stevens’ test in this draft reads as an application of the jurisprudence of the time, not a brand-new test. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:07 am
Evidence of Technical Effects: The Coordination inquired about the BRPTO’s existing examination guidelines that already allow appellants to adduce evidence to convince the examiner about the technical effects of the invention. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
Read the Guidance Here. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:41 am
For claimants and their attorneys, Witt is a reminder to be diligent and closely examine the insurer’s actions and motivations for an extension. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:34 am
Read comments and post your comment here. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Over the summer, multiple petitioners moved to stay the Rule pending litigation, which the court of appeals denied. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
The role of the 2020 agreement was also not fully examined by the Viljoen v Centlec judgment. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm
The appeal court launched into an examination of the fundamental principles of spousal support, canvassing the law on compensatory, non-compensatory, and contractual support, and citing leading cases including Chutter v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Take the time to read each question carefully and consider the specific details needed in your responses. [read post]
