Search for: "ALLES v. INTERSTATE POWER CO."
Results 221 - 240
of 476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
American Express Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:09 am
” He takes the same view of the government’s Tax Clause argument: While this case raises a host of complex constitutional issues, all seem to distill to the single question of whether or not Congress has the power to regulate — and tax — an individual’s decision not to participate in interstate commerce. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm
Gannett Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
First, he wanted to underscore the votes and organization of a complex set of opinions that upheld the individual insurance mandate under Congress’s taxing power but rejected its power to regulate interstate commerce and invalidated the compelled expansion of Medicaid in the states. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
(RLUIPA also invokes congressional power to regulate foreign, interstate, and tribal commerce, but courts have focused on the spending power.) [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
The case is Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:43 am
Plaintiff Enki Corporation says yes; Defendant Keith Freedman, along with his current employer and co-defendant, Zuora, Inc., say no. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
This judgment resulted in a successful reorganization, and all of ASARCO’s creditors were paid in full. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
The circuit court also found that the IBTA unconstitutionally burdened interstate commerce. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Congress need not leave its power to regulate interstate commerce lying dormant. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm
Moreover, while it's true that "optimal tariffs" (where one has the requisite market power) can benefit the jurisdiction that imposes them, there is still likely to be deadweight loss from the standpoint of all jurisdictions - suggesting that they should all agree to forgo even optimal tariffs if they are making this choice behind the veil.If we accept the generalization that tariffs are bad, and what's more view the federal courts under the DCC as… [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
However, if you might use the textbook next semester, and would like to see some chapters, just contact any of the co-authors, and we can mail them to you.The 11 chapters of the printed textbook proceed chronologically, from ancient Rome, Greece, and China, all the way to the post–Heller cases. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed their convictions.Writing for the Court in Kelly v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
Holmes Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
Jackson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:45 am
In Gilmer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:36 am
Co. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:27 am
American Electric Power Co., 582 F. 3d 309 (2d Cir. 2009). [read post]
