Search for: "Adams v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania" Results 221 - 240 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
The legal communication / legal rhetoric papers being presented at the conference include the following (if you know of other legal communication papers being presented at the conference, please feel free to list them in the comments): Jennifer Andrus, University of Utah, and Nathan Atkinson, Georgia State University: Photographs, Witnesses and Bodies: Toward a Visual Rhetoric of Law Joseph Bartolotta, University of Minnesota: Indulging John Marshall’s “Sympathies”:… [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am by John Elwood
  One relist did not make it back this week: the Court denied without comment in Adams v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm by John Elwood
Our final relist is Adams v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm by Joshua Matz
The Court’s opinion in the strip-search case of Florence v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
” Today the Court will hear arguments in Armour v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Pace Law School Library
  The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’sinterpretation of the Guaranteed Minimum Royalty Act to permit gas companies todeduct post-production costs from royalty payments made to landowners:  ... [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Upjohn Co., the Utah Supreme Court ruled that comment K to section 402A provided protection to prescription drug manufacturers. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
In a ruling released yesterday afternoon by the Eighth Judicial Circuit Court in Adams County, Illinois, Judge Thomas J. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:09 am by Kent Scheidegger
  State-court review with certiorari to the Supreme Court is all you get. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
Plough, Inc., 863 P.2d 167 (Cal. 1993), the California Supreme Court refused to order one of the first drugs ever – aspirin – off the market. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:36 pm by Nycole A. Thompson
Allowing the [school] district to punish Justin for conduct he engaged in while at his grandmother’s house using his grandmother’s computer would create just such a precedent …” The majority opinion, however, did not decide whether the 1969 Supreme Court case  Tinker v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
  Jeffrey Shulman has a paper on the subject “Epic Considerations: The Speech that the Supreme Court Would Not Hear in Snyder v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  But when the California Supreme Court took a look at Kearl and the case-by-case approach to comment k, the court recoiled. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Today is one of those days as we have quite a few posts on two Supreme Court cases: Kasten v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 4:46 pm
He made his debut in my initial post on the Supreme Court's decision in Staub v. [read post]