Search for: "Afford-A-Care, Inc." Results 221 - 240 of 1,917
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
The case was filed by Children’s Rights, Inc., a national child advocacy organization based in New York. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:27 am by IncNow
You should be careful when following the state’s pre-printed or online forms. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 349 (1974), which limits presumed damages in libel cases brought by private figures? [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:58 am by Fred Rocafort
Yes, forced labor products will make their way into the country, they will say, but we cannot afford to shut down China supply chains. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
E/C has not denied any medical care, therefore, claimant has not had the need to file a claim for authorization of medical care. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Federal and most state securities laws (including Florida’s Chapter 517) afford purchasers in non-exempt offerings the right to rescind their purchases and receive a return of their investments (often with interest and attorneys’ fees). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 10:48 am by Andrew Hamm
ExpressJet Airlines Inc. 20-495Issues: (1) Whether, and under what circumstances, claims arising under federal statute are subject to the Railway Labor Act’s mandatory arbitration requirement; and (2) whether the “undue hardship” inquiry in a Title VII case is an affirmative defense to liability. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:41 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., is getting attention for potentially “endangering” the practice of skinny labelling. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Referencing the longstanding, basic rules of statutory interpretation, the Court of Appeals said that in such matters a court's "primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the [l]egislature", citing Samiento v World Yacht Inc., 10 NY3d 70. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Referencing the longstanding, basic rules of statutory interpretation, the Court of Appeals said that in such matters a court's "primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the [l]egislature", citing Samiento v World Yacht Inc., 10 NY3d 70. [read post]
Sebelius (in a majority opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts and joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan) upheld the so-called “individual mandate” component of the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Act) as a valid exercise of Congress’s power. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) Smith & Nephew Inc. v. [read post]