Search for: "Akhil Amar"
Results 221 - 240
of 637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
” Professor Akhil Amar of Yale Law School was even harsher. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
’ Yale Law School professor Akhil Reed Amar offers this assessment of Bingham’s contribution: ‘It was Bingham’s generation that in effect added a closing parenthesis after the first eight . . . amendments, distinguishing these amendments from all others. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:15 am
Akhil Amar and Rob Natelson have written more extensively on this.) [4.] [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 1:08 pm
Bobbitt and Akhil Reed Amar. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 11:54 am
Liptak pointed to Yale Law Professor Akhil Reed Amar who holds the opinion that the Constitution “implicitly immunize[s] a sitting president from ordinary criminal prosecution. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 10:04 am
One of the things that is different about the constitutional law casebook that I have the honor to co-edit, in its present version with Jack, Akhil Amar, and Riva Siegel (though I remain eternally grateful to Paul Brest for his original vision and kindness in asking me to join him in the second edition), is that it includes hefty excerpts from the Lincoln-Douglas debates. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:13 pm
New York between Yale law professor Akhil Reed Amar and Georgetown law professor (and VC contributor) Randy Barnett. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
For example, Professor Akhil Reed Amar has written that even though, as a textual matter, the vice president should preside at his own impeachment trial, other constitutional principles would bar such a conflicted proceeding. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:37 am
As Professor Akhil Reed Amar observed, “Washington defined the archetypical presidential role,” and as “America’s first ‘first man,’ [he] set precedents from his earliest moments on the job. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:38 am
Akhil Reed Amar, Yale Law School (Statement) Eric Posner, University of Chicago Law School (Statement) Stephen I. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 11:20 am
The hearing will feature testimony from Akhil Amar, Eric Posner, Stephen Vladeck, and John Duffy. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:04 am
The Foreign Emoluments Clause provides that “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:00 pm
This morning’s speaker was Linda Greenhouse, to be followed by Annette Gordon-Reed, Jeffrey Rosen, Akhil Reed Amar, and Theodore Olson. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am
” In 1998, Yale scholar Akhil Reed Amar also referenced Story’s remarks in Senate testimony that later appeared in a law-review article. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
“Black’s words are cool, not hot,” Akhil Amar explains in the foreword to the second edition. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:02 am
” In 1998, Yale scholar Akhil Reed Amar also referenced Story’s remarks in Senate testimony that later appeared in a law-review article. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:52 am
Akhil Reed Amar, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
So whether or not a broader executive privilege should have been recognized by the Court, Richard Nixon should not have benefitted from it, in the same way that other privileges do not protect persons engaged in ongoing criminality.That said, as commentators such as Akhil Amar have observed, there are aspects of the Court’s reasoning that don’t hold up well to careful scrutiny. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 5:26 pm
Applying Akhil Amar’s theory of incorporation, I argue that there are strong reasons, based on history, structure, and purpose, to conclude that the Takings Clause had a different meaning under the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
As I have written in a number of columns analyzing various aspects of the NPV movement, the essential idea—a version of which was seriously floated by a small number of people including me, my older brother (Akhil Amar), and also (separately) by Professor Robert Bennett over a decade ago—seeks to permit and encourage various states to sign onto an agreement that would require each signatory state to cast its electoral college votes not for the candidate who… [read post]
