Search for: "Amendment to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration" Results 221 - 240 of 574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Gomez 14-857Issue: (1) Whether a case becomes moot, and thus beyond the judicial power of Article III, when the plaintiff receives an offer of complete relief on his claim; (2) whether the answer to the first question is any different when the plaintiff has asserted a class claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, but receives an offer of complete relief before any class is certified; and (3) whether the doctrine of derivative sovereign immunity recognized in Yearsley v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
§ 2370(e)(2) (Second Hickenlooper Amendment). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
Conversely, the district court judge in the Florida case ruled the entire statute unseverable, and therefore void, for nearly the same reason. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Nicole Huberfeld
’  Even as it revitalized judicial enforcement of the Tenth Amendment in cases such as New York and Printz, the Court treated spending as an exception by stating that the federal government could basically buy state cooperation without running afoul of the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:55 pm
Fresh Results filed a complaint, which it later amended, against ASF Holland in the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In a series of 5-4 or 6-3 decisions reached without argument, the Court made it harder to vote in various ways in Alabama, Wisconsin, and Florida. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:01 am
Creating jobs top priority for Florida Legislature. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Worth has been placed on administrative leave in light of the charges. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:45 am by Eric Goldman
Altogether, the court concludes that McCool violated Rules of Professional Conduct against Improper Ex Parte Communication (Rules 3.5(a), 3.5(b) and 8.4(a)), Dissemination of False and Misleading Information (Rule 8.4(c)) and Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice (Rule 8.4(d)). [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 10:38 am by Eric Goldman
On the plus side, it’s correct that investigatory targets usually should not be able to judicially preempt administrative investigations before they happen. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
Kemp, which ruled that even solid statistical evidence of racial disparities in the administration of the death penalty did not violate the Constitution. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
Kemp, which ruled that even solid statistical evidence of racial disparities in the administration of the death penalty did not violate the Constitution. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am by Haley Proctor
EPA, the Court considered EPA’s Aircraft Rule, which aligns domestic greenhouse gas emissions rules for aircraft with international emissions standards. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:32 am by William Consovoy
Further, the disparate-impact theory has not been judicially and administratively engrafted into the FHA merely to remedy “racial isolation in schools” – the concern Justice Kennedy found sufficient to take race into account in a nuanced and general way. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:00 pm
It is not always easy to ascertain, however, whether this outpouring of legislation and judicial rulings amounts to meaningful limitations on the use of eminent domain or merely hortatory fluff. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:01 pm by Jason Rantanen
What about judicial actions that reduce the value of patents? [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: Subscript Law has an infographic for the decision in in Florida v. [read post]