Search for: "Amendment to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure"
Results 221 - 240
of 529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 3:10 pm
Two judges in the Middle District of Florida reached opposite conclusions regarding Cf. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 7:48 am
Instead, the appellate court ruled that Section 766.1185(2) applied to the physician’s lawsuit. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
” Eleven states joined this case as State Appellants. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
While in the past, clerks and judges in each county seem to have their own set of rules and procedures for the filing and handling of “non-dissolution” matters brought by attorneys, there was often some level of flexibility at play. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm
Florida. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 11:40 am
Stat. 2003 is invalid,” with FWA and WILG designated as the “petitioners” and the State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, which had been mailed a notice of constitutional question pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.071, as the “respondent. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
Rule 3 of the Washington Rules of Civil Procedure, which you can find here, states that someone initiates a civil suit by filing a Complaint with the Court. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Rule 3 of the Washington Rules of Civil Procedure, which you can find here, states that someone initiates a civil suit by filing a Complaint with the Court. [read post]
Appeals Court Finds Medical Malpractice Pre-Suit Notice Statutes Do Not Violate Florida Constitution
31 Jul 2015, 7:16 am
The Florida court held that the law did not conflict with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.650, nor did it “intrude upon the supreme court’s procedural rule-making power” because it was “integral to other substantive portions of the statute. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 3:08 pm
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35, which sets forth the standard for when rehearing en banc should be had, says nothing about it. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
ROBINSON, ETC., Appellee. 5th District.Wrongful death -- Medical malpractice -- Presuit requirements -- Statutory amendments which allow for presuit ex parte interviews between potential defendants and potential claimants' treating health care providers, and require potential claimants to sign a written waiver of federal privacy protection concerning relevant medical information prior to instigating a medical malpractice lawsuit, are constitutional and are not preempted by Health… [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:43 am
Instead, the court said the man should have sought to amend his complaint in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure if he intended to pursue the “mode of operation” theory in support of his negligence cause of action. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:53 pm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled in the 1986 case of Cannon v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
’” Ah – the rule of the last antecedent. [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:24 am
MARTHA NASH, Appellee. 2nd District.Civil procedure -- Dismissal -- Two-dismissal rule -- Under two-dismissal rule, which provides that a notice of voluntary dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits when served by a plaintiff who has previously dismissed the action, a notice of voluntary dismissal does not operate as an adjudication on the merits when it is preceded by an “agreed order” granting a defense motion to dismiss the case with leave to… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:13 am
Because of changes to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, attorneys are now required to notify the appellate court when there is a pending motion in the trial court that delays rendition of a final order. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am
The state intermediate appellate court rejected the claim that the monitoring bracelet amounted to a Fourth Amendment “search. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:26 pm
In 2000, however, the court ruled in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
Because the court did not explicitly balance the interests of the parties as required by the Federal Criminal Procedure Rule 32.1, the parole revocation was reversed. 8. [read post]
