Search for: "Amendments To Rules Regulating the Bar"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2021, 1:21 pm
But the bigger story in the Supreme Court ruling is Thomas’s concurrence, which no other justice joined. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:01 am
The Institute, where Evelyn is a senior research fellow, filed an amicus brief in the Fifth Circuit, taking a middle ground between Texas—which argues that the First Amendment poses no bar to HB20—and the plaintiffs—who argue that the First Amendment prohibits this regulation and many other types of social media regulation besides. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
” Thus the court has upheld compulsory bar dues for lawyers because state bars use dues to administer the admission and discipline system (Keller v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The proposed amendments address issues related to technological competence, the return to the practice of law by former judges, and an amendment to the rule on encouraging respect for the administration of justice. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 2:37 pm
Some of these initiatives amended existing ex-post competition laws. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:56 am
CRA resolutions do not formally amend the underlying statute, yet of course they do so to the extent of ruling out a category of future regulations. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 4:05 am
The court held that the initiative proposal violates the single subject rule, contains a misleading description of the Amendment's effect and contains an unfunded mandate. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 6:42 am
The United States Department of Labor issued regulations earlier this year finalizing the “Persuader Rule. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 6:25 am
In April 2017, due to these allegations, Comcowich was barred from holding any registration capacities in FINRA. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:55 am
Under the Bruen ruling, the regulation in question, namely to fulfill the requirements set out in Form 4473, must be evaluated under the text and history of the Second Amendment. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:55 am
Under the Bruen ruling, the regulation in question, namely to fulfill the requirements set out in Form 4473, must be evaluated under the text and history of the Second Amendment. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am
Tam), the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the disparagement clause of the Lanham Act, which prevents registration of marks that employ disparaging names. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:55 am
He ruled that, in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 1:27 pm
In response, the FCC adopted broadband privacy rules in 2016, with EFF support. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
It is the court’s first nuanced attempt to come to grips with the First Amendment issues in social media regulation. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 1:35 pm
The announcement came on the heels of a California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools (CAPPS) lawsuit to bar implementation of the Rule. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:23 am
The Old-New Rule The Government had previously introduced new rules as part of amendments to the Employment Standards Act which took effect on January 1, 2018.[1] Under the formula which was then introduced, public holiday pay was based on the regular wages earned in the pay period prior to the public holiday, divided by the number of days worked in the relevant pay period. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:23 am
The Old-New Rule The Government had previously introduced new rules as part of amendments to the Employment Standards Act which took effect on January 1, 2018.[1] Under the formula which was then introduced, public holiday pay was based on the regular wages earned in the pay period prior to the public holiday, divided by the number of days worked in the relevant pay period. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
As an initial matter, the First Amendment generally presents no barrier to antidiscrimination rules applied to common carriers like telephone companies, railroads, and postal services.[5] Even outside the context of common carriers, the First Amendment does not operate as a complete bar to all regulations. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
But the Court’s statement was an invitation for Congress to amend and clarify a particular statute, not a declaration about the inapplicability of all general statutes that fail to mention the president. [read post]
