Search for: "American Oil Company v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 1:26 pm by Beth Graham
The judge also distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s holding in American Express Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 8:19 pm by Charles Kotuby
BG Group was a British multinational oil and gas company who had invested in an Argentine gas distribution company, and whose investment was harmed by Argentine emergency legislation. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Louis Martinez, III, No. 10-0426 Shell Oil Company, et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:09 pm by Ryan Scoville
How often do violations of customary international law occur within the United States? [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
Shell Oil Products Company; Shell Oil Products Company v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Aug. 29,2008)(Jefferson) (insurance coverage, duty to defend)ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 7:12 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
This in turn will require the foreign company to have some type of corporate entity or branch office doing business in the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Charles Sauer looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm by WIMS
"       Charles Drevna, president of the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA) said, "President Obama is right to say our nation needs to safely and responsibly develop and produce oil and natural gas in the United States while protecting our environment, and right to say we need to develop a wide range of energy sources for the future. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am by Preston Lim
This is well accepted in Canadian law, and indeed in the law of most countries, including that of the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by Susan Hennessey, Benjamin Wittes
Tillerson has close ties with President Vladimir V. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:59 am by Dianne Saxe
Are our federal courts  really less capable than courts in the United States? [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:17 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
That standard was most recent reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in MedImmune v Genentech, which stated: [Our cases] do not draw the brightest of lines between those declaratory-judgment actions that satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement and those that do not. [read post]