Search for: "Andrews v. State of Georgia*"
Results 221 - 240
of 332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2013, 6:42 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Prince v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry, while the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 10:03 pm
Bitey: I think you mean Andrew Jackson, Snapster. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
The Sad State of Indigent Defense 50 Years after Gideon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
(Andrew Caytonand Fred Anderson’s narrative of how George Washington’s bumbling mission to the Ohio valley helped spark that war helps to drive the point home.) [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
He argues that “what Georgia — and other states — have done since” the Court’s decision in Atkins v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Andrew’s in Syracuse, NY; Diocese of Central New York, et al. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:10 am
Meek v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 10:00 am
Ford v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 6:48 am
That case is Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Department of State, respectively: ? [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
" Texas accomplished this unrepentant bit of business despite a 2002 decision of the United States Supreme Court styled Atkins v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:36 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has flat out refused to follow the Supreme Court’s March 2012 Martinez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
In Georgia, meanwhile, the state supreme court has refused to designate Hill as mentally retarded, scoffing at the mandate of Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am
Writing for the DealBook blog of the New York Times, Andrew Pincus revisits the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
