Search for: "Ani v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 134,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Merit Decision: Charter School Director Not Liable for Embezzled Funds. State ex rel. Yost v. Burns.
10 May 2022, 4:31 am
Yost v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:53 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:02 am
The Court granted the defendant's petition for discretionary review without oral argument in this Brown County possession of a controlled substance case on the following issue:Whether the Court of Appeals had any jurisdiction to hear the States [sic] Appeal.In this PCS case, the trial court granted a motion to suppress all the evidence during trial, discharged the jury, declared a mistrial, and dismissed the case. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:17 am
I have previously written about the Texas Supreme Court's opinion of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:09 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
The post Vacatur and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
United States. [read post]
31 May 2015, 7:19 am
Alabama has recognized "bad faith" as a tort claim since the 1981 state supreme court decision in Chavers v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 8:00 pm
The oral argument this past Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:14 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
There, a state court does not deviate in any way from U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
See State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm
United States. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:12 am
As I understood State Farm's appellate brief in Tuepker v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 5:52 am
Some things I wanted to update you on in State Farm v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:21 am
With the continuing drama of the Scruggs scandal unfolding daily, sometimes hourly, I almost forgot to blog about the Katrina case that I have written about perhaps more than any other -- Broussard v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:47 am
Regina (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants intervening):[2012] UKSC 33; [2012] WLR (D) 211 “Any requirement which, if not satisfied, would lead to an application for leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom being refused, was a rule ‘as to the practice to be followed’ in the administration of the Immigration Act 1971 and therefore had to be laid before Parliament… [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 12:17 pm
In Ramirez-Barker v. [read post]
