Search for: "Appeal of at & T Information Systems"
Results 221 - 240
of 9,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2018, 1:17 pm
Note here – the claims don’t technically require indexing by the frequency, only being able to access that information. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The appeal was filed by the opponent whose opposition had been rejected by the Opposition Division.Claim 1 as granted read:1. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 11:01 am
This appeal was filed against the revocation of the patent under consideration by the Opposition Division. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm
The Secretary of State will inform them that they must go through the License Appeal process, and only if they win that Appeal will they be able to be re-licensed. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:23 am
We look for errors that aren’t necessarily apparent on the face of the BVA decision, and explore issues the BVA should have addressed, but didn’t. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 5:00 am
The decision in T 0660/22 combines two of PatKat's favourite things, AI and cells! [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
Following the filing of the appeal, the examining division did not rectify its decision and remitted the case to the board of appeal (Article 109 EPC). [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
It appeals to older, less educated sections of society, especially white males, in rural and declining industrial areas. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The patent proprietor filed an appeal. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
An amendment can therefore be allowable if it combines information which has not been disclosed in one and the same section of the original disclosure, but results, for instance, from information gathered from various embodiments possibly associated with general statements regarding the information derivable from the introductory section of the application. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
T 1242/04 [9.2] explains it this way: According to the established case law of the boards of appeal it is possible to raise an objection of lack of inventive step without documented prior art ? [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
It wasn’t a slam-dunk, though. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
It wasn’t a slam-dunk, though. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:10 pm
The Court of Appeal’s Opinion The Court of Appeal held as a matter of law that the trial court misapplied the “interrelated factors test” in denying the preliminary injunction in the CEQA action. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:14 am
Such a law has just been upheld by the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:29 am
I rarely appeal to the Information Commissioner, but in this case I did. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
[… T]he description turns to methods for “reading imprinted ID information” as opposed to “methods for imprinting ID information”. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 2:17 pm
“Assuming that the defendant is entitled to the information that he seeks, that entitlement must not be foiled by ‘[t]he introduction of two sovereignties,’ each able to withhold information by asserting its independent sovereignty. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
This was clear from decisions T 305/08 and T 452/05. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 5:55 pm
Turns out, it wasn't the first time for Lucas. [read post]
