Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey"
Results 221 - 240
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 5:19 am
New Jersey (which he engineered) and Blakely v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
New Jersey (requiring a jury verdict before a criminal sentence may be increased), and Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:09 am
New Jersey, the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 489 (2000). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:59 am
New Jersey, 530U.S. 466 (2000); U.S. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
New Jersey, that a judge may increase a sentence only if the enhancement is based upon facts found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Intentional Acts: HERPES INFECTION NOT AN 'ACCIDENT,' NEW JERSEY APPEALS COURT RULES, D.V. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
New Jersey and sequels apply when a jury is asked to impose death, rather than life, as a sentence. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:14 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:51 pm
New Jersey, because the State is not required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its reinvigoration of the Confrontation Clause in Crawford v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:42 pm
Supreme Court held in in Apprendi v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000): "'[T]he indictment must allege whatever is in law essential to the punishment sought to be inflicted.' (quoting 1 J. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Filed 11/9/07 P. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
New Jersey. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:18 pm
New Jersey, 530 U. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
New Jersey, Ring, Blakely, Whitfield and their progeny;” “(4) Taylor is not entitled to retroactive application of Ring or its progeny;”“(5) For the reasons discussed above, Taylor remains bound by his strategic decision in 1991 to have his sentence imposed by a judge rather than a jury. [read post]
