Search for: "Austin v. Housing Authority" Results 221 - 240 of 324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The House bill alone has nearly 100 co-authors in the 150-member chamber. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
That dubious point was rebutted well enough at the hearings by EFF-Austin board member Matt Henry (see his column in the Houston Chronicle) who compared the situation to US v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:27 am by Susan Brenner
The motion, which was filed before the trial began, noted that the prosecution obtained evidence including computer equipment, electronic storage devices, and other evidence from a search of [Rad’s] house pursuant to a search warrant requested by FBI agent Suzanne Beck and Order signed by United States Magistrate Judge Andrew Austin February 24, 2009. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm by Amy Howe
  He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm by Zachary Price
Last time the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:04 am by Josh Wright
Adler, Bernard Petrie Professor of Law and Business and Associate Dean for Information Systems and Technology, New York University School of Law Panel V. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:21 pm
With one justice not participating, the Court issued what is called a per curiam decision (not signed by any justice as author, but issued by the court as a body) in the case of Ganim v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  He’s sympathetic to authors’ rights, and listing names as a matter of tradition. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]