Search for: "B"
Results 221 - 240
of 157,902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
Punishment (3) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (2) (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment (i) in the case of a first offence, for a term not exceeding two years, and (ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, for a term not exceeding five years; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:47 am
Remember that plaintiffs bear the burden of proving each Rule 23(a) factor and at least one Rule 23(b) factor. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:31 am
[or] to make decisions affecting terms of work-related relationships, the promotion or termination of work-related contractual relationships, to allocate tasks based on individual behavior or personal traits or characteristics or to monitor and evaluate the performance and behavior of persons in such relationships” (see EU AI Act, Annex III(4)(a)-(b) (emphasis in the original)). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 6:47 pm
Gibbs & Allyson B. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 6:03 pm
Joshua B. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 4:55 pm
One such exception is Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 4:12 pm
Later, Scotland moved atop Group B with a five-wicket win over Namibia later at Kensington Oval in Bridgetown, Barbados. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
Both (A) and (B).D. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
The district court dismissed the shareholders’ claims, concluding that they had failed to plead falsity, knowledge of wrongdoing, and loss causation under the elevated standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), which requires that “a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
She received a California County Counsels’ Litigation Award for preparing an amicus brief on behalf of the California State Association of Counties in Elisa B. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 11:06 am
Therefore, Section 55.2(1) of the Canadian Patent Act had to be considered to be incompatible with the provisions of Article 28.1(a) and (b) of the TRIPS Agreement. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:56 am
The district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, finding the asserted patent claims were directed to an abstract idea and involved no inventive step. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:36 am
(B&C®) and The Acta Group (Acta®) for “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing — Complying with GLP Standards,” a complimentary webinar covering the roles and responsibilities of Study Sponsors, as defined by Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) regulations and related advisory documents, The post New Date – June 13, 2024 – “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing” Webinar; Registration Open appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell,… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:36 am
(B&C®) and The Acta Group (Acta®) for “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing — Complying with GLP Standards,” a complimentary webinar covering the roles and responsibilities of Study Sponsors, as defined by Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) regulations and related advisory documents, The post New Date – June 13, 2024 – “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing” Webinar; Registration Open appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell,… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 8:49 am
In that case, Chancellor McCormick gave the selling board a knuckle-wrapping for failing to adhere to § 251's requirement that "(b) The board of... [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:33 am
If/when the house is sold the surviving spouse gets the greater of (a) ¼ of the value after costs of sale or (b) half the increase in the equity from the date of marriage to the date the home is sold (less costs of sale). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:24 am
If a well crosses Tract A and Tract B, and 60% of the productive lateral is on Tract A, then the parties agree that the royalty owners in Tract A will be paid royalty on 60% of the production from the well. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am
Call Now 1-866-939-5940Overview of the Offence Voyeurism is covered under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada: 162 (1) Every one commits an offence who, surreptitiously, observes — including by mechanical or electronic means — or makes a visual recording of a person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if (a) the person is in a place in which a person can reasonably be expected to be nude, to expose his or her genital organs… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:19 am
The LAC, in upholding the Labour Court’s decision, emphasised that the outcome relies on a sensible interpretation of section 68(1)(b). [read post]
