Search for: "B H v. Review Board" Results 221 - 240 of 550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This update discusses selected litigation, regulations / administrative guidance and pending legislation, on both the federal and state levels, in the following general areas of environmental law: (A) Water Supply, (B) Water Quality, (C) Wetlands, (D) Air Quality, (E) Endangered Species, (F) NEPA, (G) Mining / Oil & Gas, and (H) Cultural Resources.A. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Speakers will include Secretary of the Army Mark Esper, Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer, Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson and moderator Kathleen H. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm by cdw
LEXIS 110 (N.H. 10/6/2010) Addressing proportionality review, “ instate case comparison is preferable. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent… [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Review Board and Rossville Consolidated School District (NFP) Stephen H. and Jennifer A. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Shunting Aside Chevron Deference August 7, 2018 | Jonathan H. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps BP Lubricants – United States files amicus curiae brief arguing that Rule 9(b) should apply in false marking cases – In re BP Lubricants USA Inc (Gray on Claims) Butterball – False marking plaintiffs get creative and dig deeper to support intent to deceive allegations: Buyers v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
It has been a busy summer and fall for the Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy. [read post]