Search for: "B Smith" Results 221 - 240 of 5,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2016, 9:19 am
Jeanetta Selier, Rob Slotow, Andrew Blackmore & Arie Trouwborst, The Legal Challenges of Transboundary Wildlife Management at the Population Level: The Case of a Trilateral Elephant Population in Southern Africa Rachelle Adam, Finding Safe Passage through a Wave of Extinctions: Israel's Endangered Mountain Gazelle Janina Heim & Michael Böcher, CITES and Science: Using the RIU Model to Analyze Institutionalized Scientific Policy Advice in Germany for the Case of Ivory Trade… [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 5:36 pm
Reardon, Associate Justice Judge Winifred Smith, of the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Four through August 1, 2018. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 4:53 am
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Respondent (FINRA Arbitration Decision 18-03461)SEC Charges Issuer and CEO with Violating Whistleblower Protection Laws to Silence Investor Complaints (SEC Release)SEC Charges Two Men with Fraud and Unregistered Broker Activity (SEC Release)CFTC Charges Companies and Associates with Failing to Register with the CFTC (CFTC Release)Baton Rouge Man Pleads Guilty in Federal Court to Multi-Million Dollar B... [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 8:46 am
Smith joined by Noonan and Berzon) hold that alien smuggling under 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)(A) is categorically an "alien smuggling offense" triggering a +16 level adjustment under the Guidelines, 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:51 pm by Patent Docs
Teva Pharmaceuticals that its patents were invalid by application of the on-sale bar under 35 U.S.C. 102(b). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by INFORRM
Robin Callender Smith is Professor of Media Law at the Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary, University of London. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:21 am by Marty Lederman
”  Even so, he argues that Section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution (WPR) required the President to withdraw the troops from hostilities after 90 days — an obligation that continues to this day — because Congress had not, and still has not, authorized those hostilities. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am by MBettman
The First District held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted testimony relating to Smith’s 1986 case because the evidence was properly admitted as other acts evidence under Evid.R. 404(B). [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:37 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
Pa. 1999) (a Chapter 7 petition may be dismissed under § 707(a) for lack of good faith in filing the petition); In re Smith, 229 B.R. 895, 897 (Bankr. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 1:45 pm
In a complaint entitled “Football Conspiracy / Very Weak Schedule,” the JLR (d/b/a “Dr. [read post]