Search for: "B. Bryant"
Results 221 - 240
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We took a look at a case called Birdsong v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 6:00 pm
With NCAA infractions news constantly being reported, and in light of HBO's recent "Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel" where "pay for play" was debated and booster payments to football recruits, including "the money handshake" was exposed, this timely panel will undoubtedly shed light on the NCAA's successes and failures in enforcement and its infractions policymaking.The panel is free and open to the public and will be webcast live. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:56 pm
In favor the Condemned Bryant v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:08 am
Bryant. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
Welcome from ANABob Liodice, President and CEO, ANA Liodice made an interesting point: by taking the lead in self-regulation, US advertisers/groups become models worldwide, and that has important consequences for how self-regulation can substitute for government regulation in countries that don’t have a First Amendment and aren’t particularly constrained in what they could make advertisers do if they decided to. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:03 pm
If the prosecution failed to prove A B or C beyond a reasonable doubt, then the defendant is not guilty. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
In Bryant, the court itself split. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:01 pm
But then, if the budget line item is largely fixed, whatever A gets will reduce the amount available for B. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Bryant’s trial in this case did not violate the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:19 am
Bryant, FEB11, USSC No. 09–150:Opinion: Sotomayor(1) Statements made when questioned by police are non-testimonial when circumstances objectively indicate that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to enable police assistance to meet an ongoing emergency. (2) The relevant inquiry is not the subjective or actual purpose of the individuals involved in a particular encounter, but rather the objective purpose that reasonable participants would have had, as ascertained from the… [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
One of my most favorite paintings, Asher B. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Matthew B. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:17 am
Peau-Ethique, sous-vêtement éthique et biologique, est le bébé de Cathy Abruzzo. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:42 pm
In Bullcoming (indeed, in Bryant) the Court has the opportunity to revisit the scope of the term "witnesses" in the CC. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 623 F.3d 1200 (8th Cir. 2010) (we previously discussed Bryant here). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
.] : Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, Aspen PublishersFamily LawKFP100 .Z85 2011Pennsylvania divorce code annotated : with forms / Barbara B. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
See Rule 56.01(b)(1). [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Bryant 263,035 Wayne A. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Many papers on legal communication were presented at NCA 10: The 96th Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, held November 14-17, 2010 in San Francisco, California, USA. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
See Bryant v. [read post]
